THERE ARE TOO MANY “SMOKE SCREENS” AND “CONSPIRACIES” SURROUNDING TALMUDIC JEWS AND ZIONISTS!
by Syarif Hidayat
Many people around the world say that there are too many “smoke screens” and “conspiracies” surrounding Jews and Zionists including “the writing of Balfour Letter (Declaration).”
The problems of tyranny, manipulation and oppression we face today are the same problems that have afflicted every civilization and every empire since the very beginnings of civilization as far back as we can track it. In every instance, these tragedies are all the spawn of the same secret and corrupt principles.
The term ‘Zionism’ is much used when discussing the people who are physically, socially, economically, culturally and psychologically destroying those who cherish freedom. To this end we now have such oddities as anti-Zionist Jews who hold to the racist supremacist religion of the Talmud, yet profess to be against the goal which they share with their less superstitious brethren. Is Zionism just another cover label to take attention away from the real evil in our midsts; the Synagogue of Satan itself, Organised Jewry?
Adherents to Zionism and Millennialism define their aims in purely religious terms, and present their actions as the embodiments of God’s will. However, politics and nationalism are often perceived as playing major roles in Zionist terrorism, due to the desire for a new Jewish State in Eretz Yisrael, which is a key principle in contemporary Jewish extremist dogma.
However, the perception that Jewish terrorists are involved in a secular war is fiercely contested by Jewish extremists. Goldstein and Amir for example, perceived secular political processes as interfering with the Messianic course, and their elimination was considered imperative if the Messianic process was to succeed.
‘Western democracy as we know it is incompatible with Zionism… The idea of a democratic Jewish state is nonsense.’ Jewish terrorists instead set their territorial aims against a backdrop of religiosity, and claim that nationalism is an intrinsic element of their religious creed.
Eretz Yisrael comprises the essence of Judaism, and there can be no Jewish life without the Homeland. They also employ Biblical passages to demonstrate Jerusalem’s (Zion) status as the symbol of the Holy Land and its messianic significance to the Jewish people. Their return to Zion as promised by God in various Biblical prophecies is used as evidence of the Jewish claim to the land.
This interpretation renders nationalism and religion indistinguishable from each other, for, ‘once material objects, such as land, are imbued with a spiritual dimension, it becomes impossible to compromise.’ Al-Khattor also claimed, ‘for religious people it is difficult to give up the Land, because in every prayer, in grace at the meal, and in the prayer of going to bed, and the wedding party, everywhere they have prayed for the return to Jerusalem.
They never gave up the claim of the Land.’Even the controversial issue of the proliferation of Jewish settlements, which appears decidedly territorial in nature, is also imbued with theological justification: ‘To cultivate the land of Israel was a Mitzvah by itself and it should be carried out. Therefore, settling Israel is an obligation of the religious Jews and helping Zionism is actually following God’s will.’
The relation between Zionism and anti-Semitism
As an idea, a Jewish homeland was always controversial. As a reality, Israel still is – and it is not anti-Jewish to say so. From the beginning, political Zionism was a controversial movement even among Jews.
So strong was the opposition of German orthodox and reform rabbis to the Zionist idea in the name of Judaism that Theodor Herzl changed the venue of the First Zionist Congress in 1897 from Munich to Basle in Switzerland.
Twenty years later, when the British foreign secretary, Arthur Balfour (sponsor of the 1905 Aliens Act to restrict Jewish immigration to the UK), wanted the government to commit itself to a Jewish homeland in Palestine, his declaration was delayed – not by anti-semites but by leading figures in the British Jewish community. They included a Jewish member of the cabinet who called Balfour’s pro-Zionism “anti-semitic in result”.
The relation between Zionism and anti-Semitism is surrounded by an emotional smoke screen that deters many people, including Jews, from voicing their apprehensions about Zionism. This reluctance is well known to Zionist public relations men, who make use of it in a kind of emotional blackmail.
Toward the end of the nineteenth century, the largely middle-class Jews of Western Europe had achieved a large measure of legal equality with Gentiles. They were, however, still far from having attained full social integration, and a recrudescence of anti-Semitism threatened the gains they had made. At the same time, the Jewish poor of East Europe were still denied even the most elementary civil rights, and the anti-Semitic reaction was intensifying in all spheres of life.
Zionism emerged from the growing frustration of the struggles for full social integration and democratic rights. Zionist ideology gave an illusory explanation of the defeat of these struggles. It proclaimed that minority persecution is not the result of specific social, political, economic and cultural conditions. Rather, Zionism declared, minority persecution is inherent in human nature. There is thus no point in trying to combat it; instead, one must accept it and accommodate as well as one can to this inevitable, eternal evil.
The rule of the Talmudic Jew in modern times is nearly one of an absolute monarch of a country. The Jews, through their complete domination of world finance and banking — through their malignant monopoly of the mass media of America, Britain, France, Canada and other Western powers — through their influential and vast network of subversive “lobby groups” — through their dominion over the courts and law profession in general — not to mention their pernicious presence inside the highest levels of government of the most powerful countries — have thus taken full control of the entire planet, as was foretold in ancient Jewish religious texts.
During the First World War, British policy became gradually committed to the idea of establishing a Jewish home in Palestine. After discussions in the British Cabinet, and consultation with Zionist leaders, the decision was made known in the form of a letter by Arthur James Lord Balfour to Lord Rothschild.
The letter represents the first political recognition of Zionist aims by a Great Power.
2 November, 1917
Dear Lord Rothschild,
I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty’s Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.
His Majesty’s Government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.
I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.
Arthur James Balfour
Balfour Author, Leopold Amery, Was A Hidden Jew
Jew Watch Note: Many people say that there’s “too much conspiracy writing” concerning Jews, Zionists, etc. The truth is sometimes very conspiratorial and adds up to support the many theories.
Take, for instance, Lord Balfour’s Declaration, written now, it seems, by a Jew who spent his entire life pretending to be a Christian, utilizing his deception to trick the League of Nations, Britain, and the U.S.A. into supporting his “Balfour Declaration.”
What was supposed to have been “Christian,” was really a deceptive Jew named “Leopold Amery” who was only pretending to be a member of the “majority” in order to get what he wanted for his people who were a tiny “minority” and causing untold deaths in the process on all sides, including the Jewish side …
The British author of a key international document that paved the way for the foundation of Israel covered up his own Jewish ancestry, a historian says.
Leopold Amery, a British lawmaker who drafted the Balfour Declaration, changed his middle name from Moritz to Maurice in an apparent effort to hide the fact his mother was a Jew, Prof. William Rubinstein of the University of Wales, Aberystwyth, writes in the current issue of History Today magazine.
As assistant secretary to the war cabinet in 1917, Amery drafted a letter for Lord Balfour, the foreign secretary, expressing Britain’s support for “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.”
The Balfour Declaration was endorsed by the Allied powers and included in the British mandate over Palestine, which was approved by the League of Nations.
Leopold Amery not only wrote the 1917 Balfour Declaration, which laid the groundwork for the state of Israel. In just-published research [see below], William Rubinstein, professor of modern history at the University of Wales, asserts that Amery hid his Jewishness.
Rubinstein describes Amery’s deception as “possibly the most remarkable example of concealment of identity in 20th century British political history.”
In his 1955 autobiography, Amery, who was assistant secretary to the British war cabinet in 1917, said his own father, Charles Frederick Amery, came from an old English family.
His mother, Elisabeth Leitner Amery, he wrote, was part of a stream of Hungarian exiles who fled first to Constantinople and then to England.
According to Rubinstein’s research, Amery’s mother was born to Jewish parents in 1841 and was named Elisabeth Joanna Saphir. The family lived in Pest, which later became part of Budapest and contained the city’s first Jewish quarter.
Rubinstein adds that Amery changed his middle name from Moritz to Maurice in an attempt to disguise its origins.
Rubinstein, who suspects that both of Amery’s sons knew of their Jewish origins, believes Leopold Amery decided to conceal his Jewishness because of fear of persecution and because it may have posed obstacles to his political ambitions.
Finally, Rubinstein asserts, Amery might have hidden his origins to avoid pressure for favors from the Jewish community.
As assistant secretary to the war cabinet, Amery not only drafted the Balfour Declaration but also was responsible for establishing the Jewish Legion, the first organized Jewish fighting force since Roman times, which became the forerunner of the Israel Defense Force.
Later, as secretary of state for dominion affairs from 1925 to 1929, he spearheaded what many regard as the most impressive period of peaceful growth in pre-state Israel.
But his most significant contribution to British politics was a powerful speech in Parliament that is thought to have played a key role in precipitating the departure of Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain in 1940 and the accession to power of Winston Churchill, who led Britain through World War II.
Ironically, one of Amery’s sons, John, achieved infamy when he defected to Nazi Germany and was hanged for treason in London after World War II. The other son, Julian, succeeded his father as a member of Parliament and was a staunch supporter of Israel. He died 1997.
Israel’s founder tries to erase Nakba
Saed Bannoura in his article titled “Israeli archive file shows that Israel’s founder tried to erase Palestinian Nakba” writes a new report published in the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz describes the information found in a newly-uncovered document in the government archives, which reveals that the first Israeli government, including the first Prime Minister David Ben Gurion, worked to re-write the history of Israel’s founding in 1948 to deny the fact that over 750,000 Palestinians were forcibly expelled.
The file, number GL-18/17028, was apparently missed by the Israeli military censor, who has sealed all other historical documents related to Israel’s creation in 1948. With the advent of historians like Benny Morris, who went through previously de-classified documents in detail and found strong evidence of massacres of Palestinians by Israeli armed militias as well as the forced expulsion of most of the indigenous population of Palestine in 1948, documents that had been de-classified were sealed again and remain so until today.
There are currently no guidelines or timeline as to when the documents will be unsealed. However, the one file that the government censor missed has a great deal within it on the Palestinian Nakba (catastrophe), the 65th anniversary of which was marked by Palestinians and their supporters just this past Wednesday.
According to the Ha’aretz expose, “what has been uncovered provides enough information to establish that in many cases senior commanders of the Israel Defense Forces ordered Palestinians to be expelled and their homes blown up. The Israeli military not only updated Ben-Gurion about these events but also apparently received his prior authorization, in written or oral form, notably in Lod and Ramle, and in several villages in the north.”
The file also contains information on the Israeli hasbara (propaganda) campaign that was launched after the expulsion of the Palestinians, to try to re-write what happened and deny that the Palestinian people were forcibly expelled. The Ha’aretz expose says that in the early 1960s, under pressure from the Kennedy administration in the U.S. to address the crisis of the Palestinian refugees, Ben Gurion held a special meeting at the U.N.
According to the authors, “Ben-Gurion was convinced that the refugee problem was primarily one of public image (hasbara). Israel, he believed, would be able to persuade the international community that the refugees had not been expelled, but had fled.”
One of the lies promoted in the propaganda campaign of the early 1960s was a claim that Arab and Palestinian leaders encouraged the Palestinian people to flee during the 1948 Nakba. But the evidence contained in the one unclassified file does not support that claim. Instead, it was the massacres by Israeli militias in places like Deir Yassin, in which over one hundred men, women and children were lined up and shot, that made so many Palestinians fear for their lives and flee.
The rest of the documents on the subject, including government reports and military narratives, remain classified. Many of the original documents have also been destroyed by the Israeli government, some of which (according to researchers who read them) contained accounts of massacres, rapes, brutality and excessive violence that would have been embarrassing to the Israeli state, as well as calling into question the narrative that the Israeli government promotes and the history it teaches its children.
Winston Churchill and Adolf Hitler have warned the world!
In 1920, Winston Churchill — who later sold out to the Jews and became their tool — ominously warned the world of the menacing movement that was Jewish Bolshevism. Writing in the Illustrated Sunday Herald, February 8, 1920, page 5, Churchill opined:
“This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus — Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire…
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and an the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders.”
History’s most famous critic of Jewry, Adolf Hitler, eloquently explained this Jewish trick in his book, Mein Kampf:
“The Jew’s domination in the state seems so assured that now not only can he call himself a Jew again, but he ruthlessly admits his ultimate national and political designs. A section of his race openly owns itself to be a foreign people, yet even here they lie. For while the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the national consciousness of the Jew finds its satisfaction in the creation of a Palestinian state, the Jews again slyly dupe the dumb Goyim. It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organization for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.” (A. Hitler, English translation by Ralph Manheim, Mein Kampf, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, New York, (1971), pp. 324-325.)
Report: Balfour Declaration Author Was a Jew.
- Archived from http://www.highbeam.com in accordance with “fair use” provisions of the copyright law. Israel Fax; 1/14/1999 By Israel Wire
- 4. IMEMC & Agencies