by Syarif Hidayat


       I have something about Neo Conservatives. Here it is: NeoCons Dream – Global Pax Americana fails.

     Pax Americana comes from the Latin term of “Pax Romana”. The latter means the Roman Peace, which came from the lack of opposing nations. It was a period from 27 BCE to 180 CE, in which Rome included all lands around the Mediterranean Sea and most of Northwest Europe.

      The term “Pax Americana” means essentially the same thing: an American empire without the opposition of any state.This is the intent of the Neocons (Neo Conservatives). But it doomed to fail. Actually it has failed!

      Note the precursor event to the Pax Romana: The Roman REPUBLIC was EXTINGUISHED and replaced with dictatorship!

      Kirkpatrick Sale in his article titled: “Collapse of the American Empire, writesAll empires collapse eventually: Akkad, Sumeria, Babylonia, Ninevah, Assyria, Persia, Macedonia, Greece, Carthage, Rome, Mali, Songhai, Mongonl, Tokugawaw, Gupta, Khmer, Hapbsburg, Inca, Aztec, Spanish, Dutch, Ottoman, Austrian, French, British, Soviet, you name them, they all fell, and most within a few hundred years.

     The reasons are not really complex. An empire is a kind of state system that inevitably makes the same mistakes simply by the nature of its imperial structure and inevitably fails because of its size, complexity, territorial reach, stratification, heterogeneity, domination, hierarchy, and inequalities.

The Zionist Empire


      What do you think is happening RIGHT NOW to the U.S.A?

The American Empire is now being replaced by The Zionist Corporate World Empire?

      So now there is no such a thing as called Pax Americana or The American Empire that the NeoCons are dreaming and trying to create. The world power that is building up right now is The Zionist Corporate World Empire that continues to strengthen its hegemony around the World using the Western countries willingly or not and knowingly or not as its tools.

      The US is merely a blind loyal servant of the Zionists and the NeoCons are only tools of the Zionists to whip and spur the Washington leaders and Congressmen to support anything the Zionist Empire needs or the NeoCons are part of the Zionist Empire!

      The wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and western intervention in Libya as well as covert operations in  Syria which have been killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people in those countries are also wrongful for American people and are only beneficial to the Zionists.


      “Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.” – Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, October 3, 2001, to Shimon Peres, as reported on Kol Yisrael radio.(recorded)


      “Our race is the master race. We are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet, and serve us as slaves. “Menachem Begin Israeli PM, 1977-1983

     “We are one nation. We are neither American Jews nor Soviet Jews, but only Jews!”–Theodore Herzl father of the Zionist movement

     “We Jews, we are the destroyers and will remain the destroyers. Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own.” (You Gentiles, by Jewish Author Maurice Samuels, p. 155).

       Zionist Theodor Herzl: “We Will Lead Every Revolution Against Us”.

      “You can help us or we ‘will overthrow the world’.” Chaim Weizmann, first president of the State of Israel


the world government AND Supreme Court of mankind


      “We will have a world government whether you like it or not. The only question is whether that government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” (Jewish Banker Paul Warburg, February 17, 1950, testifying before the U.S. Senate).


       Read the Words of one of the founders of the state of Israel: “The image of the world…as traced in my imagination — the increasing influence of the farmers and workers, and the rising political influence of men of science, may transform the United States into a welfare state with a planned economy. Western and Eastern Europe will become a federation of autonomous states having a socialist and democratic regime. With the exception of the U.S.S.R. as a federated Eurasian state, all other continents will become united in a world alliance, at whose disposal will be an international police force. All armies will be abolished, and there will be no more wars. In Jerusalem, the United Nations (A truly United Nations) will build a shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents.” – (David Ben Gurion)

       The Jew Samuel Roth wrote about it in his book “Jews Must Live”.  What the Jew really wants and expects to achieve through the instrumentality of the Hebrew school is to cultivate in his son the sharp awareness that he is a Jew and that as a racial Jew-apart from all the other races-he is waging an old war against his neighbors.

      Jews have made war on their neighbors since their beginnings.  In ancient times they were known as destroyers.  Since their expulsion from Jerusalem in 70 AD the Jews have maintained their nation inside other nations but their primary loyalty is always to the Jewish people, to Israel.  In many places they have allied themselves with the government and acted as tax collectors in other places, such as Russia, they have been the primary force in the overthrow of the government.  Communism was Jewish in origin and Jews occupied positions of great power throughout European communism.  Israel is a religious state that pays the rabbi’s salary and grants rights to Jews that are denied to the original inhabitants, the Palestinians.  It is a state that began with ethnic cleansing which continues to this day with American tax money of over 3 billion dollars each year providing the financial basis of all its actions. 

      For the Jews the people are the nation, the people are Israel, the people are the Divine Whole.  The people, Israel, is pure, the “other”, the goim, you and me, are impure.  “The Jews are not a part of a vast Whole which they re-integrate in dying, but they are a Whole in themselves, defying space, time, life, and death. Can God be outside the Whole? If he exists, necessarily he confounds himself with this Whole…Thus Divinity in Judaism is contained in the exaltation of the entity represented by the Race – passionnel entity, eternal flame, it is the Divine essence. It must be preserved and perpetuated, therefore the idea of pure and impure was created.” – (Nomades, Kadmi Cohen, (1929).


The Jews form an Ethnic Intelligence Apparatus

      The Jews form an Ethnic Intelligence Apparatus in any nation in which they exist in any numbers to pursue the aims of their people/nation, Israel and to fight against the enemies of Israel.  They do this today in America.  Do you doubt this Ethnic Intelligence Apparatus?  Turn on your television.  Check out the news and shows.  Watch Wolf Blitzer turn to Schnecher and Ali Kashvili, all Jews, then there’s Mike Wallace and Leslie Stahl, Heraldo Rivera and Barbara Walters.  And: William Safire, Alan Colmes, A. M. Rosenthal,   Charles Krauthammer,   Martin Perez,   Daniel Pipes,   Dick Morris,   Lawrence Kaplan,   William Kristol,   Robert Kagan,   Mortimer Zuckerman,   David Gelernter,   John Podhoretz,   Mona Charen,   Morton Kondracke,   Sid Zion,   Yossi Klein Halevi,   Norman Podhoretz,   Jonah Goldbern,   Jeff Jacoby,   Rich Lowry,   Seth Lipsky, Irving Kristol,   John Fund,   Ben Wattenberg,   Lawrence Kudlow,   Alan Dershowitz,   David Horowitz,   Jacob Heilbrun,   Michael Ledeen,   Uri Dan, Thomas Friedman,   Richard Cohen, Avishai Margolit,   David Remmick,   Eric Alterman to name a few. More info @ Jews in the Media   Who Rules America? 

       Read about the changes the Jews made at the Canadian media company CanWest.  CanWest-Israel.  Read about the Newhouse Media Empire, or read about the power of Jews in the media in England.

      “The most effective component of Jewish connection is probably that of media control. It is well known that American public opinion molders have long been largely influenced by a handful of powerful newspapers, including the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, owned respectively by the Sulzbergers, Meyers, and the Pulitzers, (all Jewish families).”  – Alfred Lilienthal, The Zionist Connection II, 1978, pp. 218-219


Neo-con Jews

       Look behind the push to the War in Iraq and you will find a number of Neo-con Jews including Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith and Elliot Abrams.  A surprising number have been investigated for spying for Israel. 

      Who’s neo-con (neoconservative) movement now heavily influences our foreign policy  Neoconservatism is better described in general as a complex interlocking professional and family network centered around Jewish publicists and organizers flexibly deployed to recruit the sympathies of both Jews and non-Jews in harnessing the wealth and power of the United States in the service of Israel. 

Israel is satisfied with shabbez goyim of the US and British armies!!

      A Zionist war criminal Avi Dichter, the former Israeli Minister of Internal Security, former head of Shin Bet  (Shabak) from 2000-2005, and current member of the racist institution of the Knesset, issued an ominous speech to the Israeli National Security Research Center on May 26, 2010.

       Dichter told the audience:  “We have achieved in Iraq more than we expected and planned. Iraq has vanished as a military force and as a unified country. Our strategic option is to keep it divided. Our strategic goal is to not allow Iraq to take its regional and Arabic role back. Iraq must stay divided and isolated from its regional environment. Nobody can ignore what we have achieved in this field. Iraq can never be the same Iraq before 2003.”

Zionist ordered Genocide in Iraq


      Up to date more than 2 000 000 Iraqis have been killed as a result of the Zionist-orchestrated “Gulf War” since 1991. IN SUMMARY, the HUMAN COST of the Afghan and Iraq Wars is estimated below from the latest UN figures to now total 2.7 MILLION avoidable deaths. This is because the Jewish ideology, i.e. the Old Testament, the Torah, demands a terrible revenge – the total annihilation – of those who dare to oppose the plans of the Jews. 

     After 12 years of killing sanctions the Zionists, using shabbez goyim of the US and British armies, moved in for the death blow against Iraq as an independent Arab state. This second aggression on Iraq waged in 2003 is a Zionist war of domination and occupation, of extending Israel´s lebensraum, of the fulfillment of the Jewish prophecy in the Torah of a Jewish state – “Eretz Israel” – stretching between the rivers Nile and Eufrat.– Theodore Herzl, founder of Modern Zionism.


GW Bush Is A Zionist Double Agent?


     Texe Marrs in his arcticle “George W. Bush, Zionist Double Agent, American Traitor” says:I have decided to reveal to you the name of yet another crypto-Jew. This time, the culprit is a man who is only the latest in a series of dynastic leaders, all of whom were and are Jews and all of whom have carefully and watchfully guarded this Great Secret. I hereby stamp myself—according to the reigning criteria or rules promulgated by the Illuminati elite—as a bonafide anti-Semite merely by once again calling a Jew a Jew. Fact: GEORGE W. BUSH, is a Jew.

       Absurd? Preposterous, you say? Well, I have carefully traced the history of the Bush Dynasty, including the Rothschild faction, and without hesitation I declare to you that, yes, indeed, George W. Bush is a Jew: A Jew by race, a Jew by religious choice. Hidden from public view.

       What the media dare not tell you is that, as President, George W. Bush appointed as his first official White House spokesman, a Jew—in fact, a Jewish rabbi—Ari Fleischer. He retained a Jewish banker, Alan Greenspan, as Chairman of the Federal Reserve. He made a Jewish Rabbi, Dov Zackheim, the Comptroller (money man!) of the Pentagon, and he placed a Jewish ideologue and Christian hater, Michael Chertoff, in the scary position of being head of FEMA and Homeland Security. Yes, Chertoff, an ADL fiend whose father is a Jewish rabbi, is now America’s Gulag Commandant, our American version of Himmler.

      My investigation of the Bush-Jewish connection has been in progress for six years now. One thing I discovered is that George W. Bush is a devoted student of the Jewish Talmud, just as were Marx, Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin. He is also a dedicated agent of Zionist Israel, which makes him double agent and traitor to the United States of America.

       Bush has adopted the same techniques of torture, political deceit, perpetual war, and pure hatred of perceived enemies, as has the notorious Israeli spy agency, Mossad. The Mossad’s motto is “By Way of Deception Make War.” This, not coincidentally, is also George W. Bush’s motto. How very Talmudic. How very Satanic.


“Christians Who Are Not Christians”


       But, isn’t Bush supposed to be a Christian? How, then can he be a religious Jew? Ah, perhaps those who ask this question should read books like Colonel Donn de Grand Pré’s insightful Barbarians Inside the Gates: Book Three, the Rattler’s Revenge. As my friend, the good Colonel de Grand Pré, notes so wisely in his excellently documented volume, we are confronted today by Leviathan, a two-headed monster, “one head comprised of Jews who are not Jews and the other, Christians who are not Christians.” – Texe Marrs.


How the Syrian civil war exposes the decline of American empireby: Ramzy Baroud


       In an article published on May 15, American historical social scientist Immanuel Wallerstein wrote, “Nothing illustrates more the limitations of Western power than the internal controversy its elites are having in public about what the United States in particular and Western European states should be doing about the civil war in Syria.”

       Those limitations are palpable in both language and action. A political and military vacuum created by past US failures and forced retreats after the Iraq war made it possible for countries like Russia to reemerge on the scene as an effective player.

        It is most telling that over two years after the Syrian uprising-turned bloody civil war, the US continues to curb its involvement by indirectly assisting anti-Bashar al-Assad regime opposition forces, through its Arab allies and Turkey. Even its political discourse is indecisive and often times inconsistent.

       Concurrently, Russia’s position remains unswerving and constantly advancing while the US is pushed into a corner, demonstrating an incapacity to react except for condemnations and mere statements. Much to the displeasure of its Arab allies.

        Russia’s recent delivery of sophisticated anti-ship missiles and its own buildup of warships in the eastern Mediterranean is a case in point. The move was condemned by the Obama administration as one that is “ill-timed and very unfortunate”.

        But this American attitude in the region is fairly new. Behind it stands a history bloody and filled with imprudent foreign policy. Regardless of how the US decides to move on Syria, the chances are that a return to its old dominant approach is no longer an option.

        The current American political impotence in the Middle East is unprecedented, at least since the rapid disintegration of the Soviet bloc in the early 1990s.

       The dissolution of the Soviet Union had ushered in the rise of a unipolar world, wholly managed by the United States. The rise of the uncontested American hegemony represented a shift in historical dialectics, where great powers found their match and the rest of the world, more or less, accommodated the ensuing competition.

       Then, the US acted quickly to assert its dominance starting with hasty military adventures such as the invasion of Panama in 1989. A much more calculated move followed with a devastating war against Iraq in 1990-91. In Panama the objective was to remind the US’s southern neighbors that the region’s cop was still on duty and was capable of intervening at a moment’s notice to rearrange the entire political paradigm in any way that Washington deemed necessary – as this has been the case since the CIA-orchestrated coup and war in Guatemala in 1954 and even earlier.


Pseudo peace that caters to Israel’s interests


       The US’s massive military involvement in Iraq, however, was that of a conqueror who arrived with an entourage of many countries – regional and Western allies – to claim the spoils resulting from the end of the protracted Cold War. It was an arrogant show of force since the target was a single Arab country with humble military and economic means vs. major military powers from near and far.

       The war devastated Iraq – its initial aerial bombing campaign alone involving the dropping of 88,500 tons of bombs. Many new weapons were used and tested, while the US media and public celebrated the prowess of their military. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis died or were wounded as a result of one of the most asymmetrical wars in history.

       Trying to capitalize on its military triumph, Washington quickly pushed for a political settlement between its closest ally, Israel, and Arab countries. The logic behind the Madrid Conference in 1991 was achieving pseudo peace that catered to Israel’s interests, while opening up the gate of normalization between Israel and its neighbors. Moreover, the US hoped to achieve some sort of “stability” that would allow it to manage the Middle East region and its ample resources in a less hostile environment.

       Eventually, Israel managed to negotiate its own political deal with the Palestinians, thus dividing Arab ranks and ensuring that the “peace talks’” outcome was entirely consistent with Israel’s colonial ambitions.

       As years passed, the US and Israeli political visions moved even closer, but with Washington eventually becoming a mere conduit to Israeli colonial objectives. This fact was underscored repeatedly under the George W Bush administration, which compounded US failure in the region with even more disastrous and dangerous wars.

       A major fault in US foreign policy is that it is almost entirely reliant on military power – as in the ability to blow things up. The US war on Iraq which, in various forms, extended from 1990 to 2011, included a devastating blockade and ended with a brutal invasion.

       This long war was as unscrupulous as it was violent. Aside from its overwhelming human toll, it was placed within a horrid political strategy aimed at exploiting the country’s existing sectarian and other fault lines, therefore triggering a civil war and sectarian hatred from which Iraq is unlikely to cover for many years.

       But the limitations of US military power became quite obvious in later years. The empire was no longer able to bridge the divide between translating its dominance on the ground – itself increasingly challenged by local resistance groups – into a level of political progress required to achieve the minimum amount of “stability”.

       Moreover, an economic recession, coupled with the Iraqi retreat and an equally costly debacle in Afghanistan – forced the new administration in Washington, under the leadership of President Barack Obama to rethink Bush’s earlier quest for global hegemony. Massive military cuts were soon to follow. Concurrently, the imbalance of global power was slowly, quietly but surely being equalized with the rise of China as a new possible contender.

       In the midst of the US transition and policy rethink, an upheaval struck the Middle East. Its manifestations – revolutions, civil wars, regional mayhem and conflicts of all sorts – reverberated beyond the Middle East.


“Arab Spring”


       Shrinking and rising empires alike took notice. Fault lines were quickly determined and exploited. Players changed positions or jockeyed for advanced ones, as a new Great Game was about to begin. The so-called “Arab Spring” was rapidly becoming a game-changer in a region that seemed resistant to transformations of any kind.

      The transformation of the Middle East – promising at times, very gory and bloody at others – arrived at a time when the US was making forced adjustments in its military priorities. Putting greater focus on the Pacific region and the South China Sea are such examples. Without much notice, it was forced to reengage with the Middle East, as a whole – not a country at a time. Only then, its weaknesses were seriously exposed and its lack of influence became palpable.

        Bankrupt is maybe an appropriate term to use in describing the current US policy in the Middle East. Imprudent military adventures devastated the region but achieved no long-term objectives. Reckless policies that are predicated on trying to exploit, as opposed to understand the Middle East and its complex political and historical formation and the insistence on keeping Israel a main priority in its approach to the vastly shifting political lines, will unlikely to bode well for US interests.

      However, unlike the early 1990s, when the US moved to reshape the entire region and established permanent military presence, new dynamics are forcing it to change tactics. In this new reality, the US is incapable of reshaping reality but merely trying to offset or control its unfavorable outcomes.

      “What the United States (and western Europe) want to do is ‘control’ the situation,” Immanuel Wallerstein argued. “They will not be able to do it. Hence the screams of the ‘interventionists’ and the foot-dragging of the ‘prudent.’ It is a lose-lose for the west, while not being at the same time a ‘win’ for people in the Middle East.”

       This “lose-lose” scenario might not necessarily translate to a complete American foreign policy meltdown in the near future, but will certainly open the possibility for new/old players to main serious gains, Russia being a lead example. This will likely compel the US to change tactics, despite the incessant objections of neoconservative forces and the Israeli lobby. (HSH)




3. International news agencies


  1. I just want to mention I’m all new to blogs and absolutely savored you’re page. Very likely I’m going to bookmark your blog . You surely come with wonderful posts. Regards for sharing your blog.

Write a comment or Leave a Reply. Thank You! Kind Regards Web Administrator/Editor

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s