by Syarif Hidayat
Ironically…, Al Qaeda –the “outside enemy of America” as well as the alleged architect of the 9/11 attacks– is a creation of the CIA.
What are the historical origins of Al Qaeda?
Who is Osama bin Laden?
The alleged mastermind behind the 9/11 terrorists attacks, Saudi-born Osama bin Laden, was recruited during the Soviet-Afghan war, “ironically under the auspices of the CIA, to fight Soviet invaders”.
The CIA’s role in laying the foundations of Al Qaeda is confirmed in an 1998 interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, who at the time was National Security Adviser to President Jimmy Carter: Brzezinski: According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahideen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, [on] 24 December 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise. Indeed, it was July 3, 1979, that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul.
Most of the world believes Bin Laden was a CIA agent. He was first funded in the 80s by the CIA. There is also no record of him using the term, ‘Al Qaeda’, which means ‘the toilet’ until after 9-11. Tim Osman (Ossman) has recently become better known as Osama Bin Laden. “Tim Osman” was the name assigned to him by the CIA for his tour of the U.S. and U.S. military bases, in search of political support and armaments.
There is some evidence that Tim Osman … visited the White House. There is certainty that Tim Osman toured some U.S. military bases, even receiving special demonstrations of the latest equipment.
1. In the so-called “War on Terror” in Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Yemen and the other targeted countries, the US-led western regimes forces are hunting and killing what they call Al Qaeda terrorists.
2. In the so-called “War of Liberation” in Libya, the US-led western civilization regimes forces are working together with Al Qaeda (bin CIA-Mossad) terrorists and in the Covert Operations in Syria, the US-led western civilization regimes are arming Al Qaeda terrorists.
“Formation of Al Qaeda: US-Israel Collaboration” – SPECIAL REPORT: “The top secret Israeli-US program to establish “Al Qaeda””- by Wayne Madsen in Opinion Maker.
Press clips gathered by the CIA and discovered in the National Archives’ stored CIA files point to an agency keenly interested in any leaks about the highly-classified CIA-Mossad program to establish Osama Bin Laden and the most radical elements of the Afghan Mujahidin as the primary leaders of the anti-Soviet rebels in the 1980s.
WMR [Wayne Madsen Report] has pored through the CIA files and a complicated picture emerges of America’s and Israel’s top intelligence agencies, in cahoots with Saudi Arabia, establishing financial links and carve out intelligence programs to provide manpower and financial support to Bin Laden and his allies in Afghanistan.
It was these very elements that later created the so-called “Al Qaeda,” which the late British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook described as nothing more than a “database” of CIA front organizations, financial supporters, and field operatives. However, one component omitted by Cook in the Al Qaeda construct is the Israeli participation.
They say they are fighting for an “Islamic state.” But their actions tell a different story. By brutalizing civilians and committing war crimes, the Takfiri extremists in Syria are violating the very shariah they claim to be fighting for. UN officials said the Takfiris are committing “a ‘soaring’ number of executions” that appear to be war crimes.
The Associated Press reported: “U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay says that over the past two weeks her office has received reports of a succession of mass executions of civilians and fighters who were no longer participating in hostilities in Aleppo, Idlib and Raqqa by hardline armed opposition groups in Syria, in particular by the al-Qaida linked Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.”
By claiming they are fighting for an “Islamic state” while committing horrendous war crimes, the Takfiris are waging a public relations jihad against Islam. No wonder the Zionists support them!
“I recently debated Michael Parenti, a secularist critic of religion, on my radio show. When I mentioned that Islam is the most tolerant of the three Abrahamic monotheisms, citing historical examples of Muslims protecting religious diversity, Parenti responded: Yes, that may have been true in the past, but look at Muslims now!” writes Dr. Kevin Barrett* in a column article published in Press TV website.
Look at what they’re doing in Syria! I tried to explain that the Takfiri extremists in Syria do not represent the world’s Muslims. But since the Takfiris use and abuse the word “Islamic,” and draw support from Saudi Arabia – the custodian of the Muslim holy cities – people like Michael Parenti use them as examples of the alleged extremism of Islam, says in his article titled “Takfiri extremists wage war on Islam.”
What kind of “Islam” advocates ripping out the heart of a dead enemy and eating it for the camera? What kind of “Islam” allows the procuring of women for illicit temporary relationships with soldiers? What kind of “Islam” condones mass executions of people because they are Christians or moderate Muslims?
Though war is a bloody and unpleasant business, Muslims commanders and soldiers have historically been known for their unusual degree of chivalry, mercy, and restraint. When the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) conquered his absolute worst enemies – the Meccans who had so horribly persecuted him and his followers – he foreswore revenge and commanded mercy. The opening of Mecca was the nearest thing to a bloodless conquest in the history of warfare.
The example of the Prophet (PBUH) has inspired countless examples of Muslim chivalry, or “futuwwa,” throughout history. Indeed, it was the “futuwwa” of the courteous, compassionate, self-abnegating Muslim warriors of Islamic Spain – whose kind, gentle, devoted treatment of women was then-unheard-of in Europe – who brought the notions of chivalry and courtly love to the West.
Hind(un) and Takfiri Cannibal
By contrast, it was the Muslims’ most fanatical enemy, Hind, who ripped the liver out of the fallen Muslim warrior Hamza and ate it on the battlefield. The Takfiri cannibal who ate the Syrian soldier’s heart was symbolically declaring to the world that he was an enemy of Islam – just like Hind. Most Muslims understand this. But non-Muslims around the world who witness such atrocities are likely to mistakenly attribute them to Islam, or “Islamic extremism.”
The Takfiris are committing more and more atrocities, not only against Syrian government forces, Christians, and moderate Muslims, but also against each other. According to news reports, infighting between the al-Qaida affiliate Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant and other Takfiri and anti-government groups in Syria has killed hundreds of people over the past two weeks. The Takfiris make a habit of executing people who do not share their fanatical misinterpretation of Islam. This practice is utterly un-Islamic.
Throughout history, Muslims have been enjoined to protect people of other religions. One noteworthy example: When the great Christian Saint Francis – the current Pope’s namesake – decided he wanted to become a martyr, he traveled into Islamic territory in order to preach Christianity and argue strongly against Islam. Francis expected the Muslims would kill him, just as the Christians would have killed a Muslim who entered Christian territory to argue strongly against Christianity. It was, after all, the year 1219, and the Fifth Crusade was raging.
But no matter how hard he argued against Islam, Francis could not provoke any Muslims to violence. Sultan al-Kamil, the nephew of Salah ad-Din (Saladin), welcomed Francis to his camp and spent long nights with him in religious discussions. Neither converted the other, but the outcome was mutual respect.
Sultan al-Kamil’s uncle Salah ad-Din had similarly won the respect of Christians when he re-conquered al-Quds (Jerusalem) and followed the prophetic example of showing mercy to his enemies.
Today, the headlines are dominated by the likes of al-Qaeda, which claims to be defending Muslims, but actually seems to be an anti-Islam public relations campaign. Ordinary Muslims are caught between the self-styled “Islamic terrorists” and the only slightly less obnoxious, foundation-funded “professional moderate Muslims” who are willing to sell out their faith and keep their mouths shut about the 9/11-triggered War on Islam. It’s a New World Order pincer operation, designed to weaken Islam and make the world safe for usury, Zionism, and crass materialism.
Fortunately, the world’s Muslims are increasingly speaking out against the Takfiris in general, and the persecution of Christians in particular. A group called the Covenants Initiative is asking Muslims to sign a statement bearing witness to the Covenants of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) with the Christians of the World. The Covenants Project is on-line at http://www.Covenants Of The Prophet.com.
Genuine Islam is a moderate “middle way,” not a fanatical, intolerant, or violent faith. Its strongest defense against the Takfiris and their New World Order sponsors is the truth. As the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is reported to have said, “The best jihad is a word of truth flung in the face of a tyrant.”
Bandar bin Sultan: Prince of Terrorists
Bandar bin Sultan is the director general of the Saudi Intelligence Agency. In that capacity, he has earned a well-deserved reputation as the “Prince of Terrorists,” writes Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist. According to the Wall Street Journal, Bandar is leading the rebel forces trying to overthrow the Syrian government. Many analysts consider Bandar a prime suspect in the apparent false-flag chemical weapons attack in al-Ghouta.
Adam Entous of the Wall Street Journal says that Prince Bandar and his Saudi Intelligence Agency manufactured “evidence” that the Syrian government had used sarin gas prior to the al-Ghouta attack. Entous stated during a Democracy Now interview: “Bandar’s intelligence agency concluded that chemical weapons were being used on a small scale by the regime. Followed by that, the Brits and the French were convinced of the same conclusion. It took US intelligence agencies really until June to reach that conclusion.”
In other words, Bandar used his money, clout, and connections to make sure that “the intelligence would be fixed around the policy” – just like Bush did with the alleged Iraqi WMDs in 2003. How did Bandar convince Western intelligence agencies to accept his extremely dubious claims that Assad was using sarin gas? Bandar found a Syrian who had been exposed to sarin and flew him to Britain to be tested. When the Syrian victim tested positive for sarin, Bandar pushed his Western intelligence colleagues to accept the far-from-obvious conclusion that Assad must have been responsible.
According to Entous: “What the British found when they did the testing was that this Syrian was exposed to sarin gas, which the US and British and French intelligence believe is only in the possession of the Syrian regime.”
But do the US and British and French intelligence really believe that Bandar – who commands hundreds of billions of dollars and a sophisticated network of covert operators and killers – could not have poisoned the Syrian victim himself? Obviously, they are not that naïve. Western intelligence is complicit in Bandar’s attempt to frame Assad for the use of sarin. They were looking for an excuse to attack Syria, and Bandar gave it to them.
Then when the huge sarin attack struck al-Ghouta on August 21st, knowledgeable observers immediately suspected a false-flag attack by Bandar’s forces. According to Associated Press Mideast correspondent Dale Gavlak and Yahya Ababneh: “… from numerous interviews with doctors, Ghouta residents, rebel fighters and their families, a different picture (from the Western mainstream media narrative) emerges. Many believe that certain rebels received chemical weapons via the Saudi intelligence chief, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, and were responsible for carrying out the deadly gas attack.”
More evidence that the terrorist prince orchestrated the attack on al-Ghouta emerged when it was revealed that the photos of dead children were not what they appeared. According to VoltaireNet.org:
“Following the broadcasting of the images of the massacre in Ghouta, distributed by the Free Syrian Army and relayed by US and French services, Alawite families from Latakia have filed a complaint for murder.”
“Some of these videos were filmed and posted on Youtube before the events they picture.” “They show children suffocating from a chemical intoxication that can’t possibly be sarin gas (the latter provokes yellow drool, not white drool).”
“The children do not correspond to a sample of the population: they are all almost of the same age and have light hair. They are not accompanied by their grieving families.” “They are in fact children who were abducted by jihadists (i.e. mercenaries of Prince Bandar) two weeks before in Alawite villages in the surroundings of Latakia, 200km away from Ghouta.”
“Contrary to the claims of the Free Syrian Army and the Western services, the only identified victims of the Ghouta massacre are those belonging to families that support the Syrian government. In the videos, the individuals that show outrage against the ‘crimes of Bashar el-Assad’ are in reality their killers.”
Is terrorist prince Bandar really shameless enough to kidnap children, murder them, and then present the dead children as alleged victims of his enemies?
In a word: Yes.
Bandar’s shamelessness knows no bounds. The dissolute chief of “radical Islamic terrorists” actually had the audacity to threaten Russian President Putin with a terrorist attack on the Winter Olympics if Putin didn’t stop supporting the Syrian government! Bandar claimed that he had the full support of the American government in delivering his bribe offers and terrorist threats to President Putin. Bandar, an intimate of the Bush crime family who is affectionately known as “Bandar Bush,” also appears to have been involved in the 9/11 false-flag attacks. Let’s look at some of the evidence – admittedly circumstantial – that links Bandar to 9/11.
Of the alleged 19 hijackers, 15 were Saudis. CIA sources have confirmed testimony from Michael Springman, the former head of the US Visa Bureau in Jeddah, about the Saudi “muscle hijackers”: They were CIA agents, presumably with a background in Saudi intelligence, who came to America on CIA “snitch visas.” These were special visas that the CIA offered as a reward to Saudis who spied for the US. (Saudi Intelligence is so closely connected to the CIA that it is hard to tell where one ends and the other begins.)
While living in the US, the future alleged 9/11 hijackers lived charmed lives. They trained at secure US military facilities, including Pensacola Naval Air Station, where Mohamed Atta was a regular partier at the officers’ club, and Maxwell Air Force Base in Alabama. Two of the alleged hijackers received regular checks totaling tens of thousands of dollars from Prince Bandar and his wife, funneled through US-Saudi intelligence asset Omar al-Bayoumi. Immediately after 9/11, all air traffic in the US was grounded. The only planes allowed to fly were special private jets that Bush and Cheney arranged to fly Bandar, along with Bin Laden family members and other Saudi suspects, out of the country before they could be interrogated by the FBI.
Evidence suggests that Prince Bandar has been the operations chief of al-Qaeda, the CIA data-base of its Arab legion of mujahideen fighters, ever since the Afghan war of the 1980s. It is these CIA-supported, Mossad-supported al-Qaeda fighters that Bandar commands today in Syria. In short, it is Bandar Bush, Prince of Terrorists – not the well-meaning dupe Osama Bin Laden, or the shrill ideologue al-Zawahiri – who has always been the real commander of the Western intelligence operation known as “al-Qaeda.”
* (Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist, is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror. Dr. Barrett has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications. Dr. Barrett has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin, where he ran for Congress in 2008. He is the co-founder of the Muslim-Christian-Jewish Alliance, and author of the books Truth Jihad: My Epic Struggle Against the 9/11 Big Lie (2007) and Questioning the War on Terror: A Primer for Obama Voters (2009). His website is www.truthjihad.com).
Facts speak for themselves correctly and objectively that some of the Arab and Muslim leaders (kings, presidents and prime ministers) including Egyptian military (coup) leaders, Libyan rebel leaders and Syrian rebel leaders are stupid baboons who could be easily fooled, drugged and dragged and finally deceived by the Imperialist and Zionist ploys into supporting their interests to sow discord among Muslim countries including demonizing Iran as a threat to the Arab world and intervening in the other Arab countries as well as make them fight each other at the expense of their own fellow countrymen! … and the winners are the Zionist and Imperialist corporate world!
I am very sorry for my Arab brothers and sisters! (HSH)